Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Hobbs

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1961No. 6895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents the unique question whether, as a prisoner, appellant is entitled to compensation benefits under the provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Act for injuries sustained by him while working for the City of Hobbs. Compensation was denied in the lower court, and he appeals.

The appellant was convicted in the municipal court of having committed an assault and of various traffic offenses, for which he was sentenced to serve a term of 10 days in jail and to pay a fine of $100. He served the jail sentence, and, being unable to pay the fine, his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McBurney v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. California Highway Commission v. Industrial Accident CommissionnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Greene's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Murray County v. HoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Bergstresser v. City of Willow LakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Benavidez v. Sierra Blanca MotorsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Haworth v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Watson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Benavidez v. Sierra Blanca MotorsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Drake v. County of EssexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API