Legal Opinion
Murray County v. Hood
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 25, 1933No. 23630PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an original action in this court to review an award made b> the State Industrial Commission in favor of R. M. Hood. The county of Murray, bv its board of county commissioners, and Hie United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, are petitioners. R. M. Hood and the State Industrial Commission of the state of Oklahoma are respondents, and the parties will be hereinafter referred to as petitioners and respondents as they appear hereinabove.
The evidence herein discloses that on the 16th day of October, 1930, one of the respondents, R. M. Hood, was, on a conviction, sentenced by the county…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Board of Trustees of Crutcho Township v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3Cited by13 opinions
- Haworth v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Board of County Commissioners v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
- Bergstresser v. City of Willow LakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Shain v. Idaho State PenitentiaryIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Village of West Milwaukee v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.