Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. Carter
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided December 5, 1983No. Civ. A. C 83-0749 L(A)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALLEN, Chief Judge.
Bobby McIntosh brings this pro se action against Rockie Carter, Internal Affairs Office, and other staff members at the Kentucky State Reformatory in LaGrange, Kentucky, where McIntosh is an inmate. Jurisdiction is alleged under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. McIntosh alleges that the defendants violated his constitutional rights by refusing his right to confrontation and by the use of evidence which he was not allowed to view. The defendants move to dismiss. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). McIntosh moves for the appointment of counsel and for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- LeDuc v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kenneth McClure Young, II v. Warren Kann and Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Muhammad v. ButlerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Fillmore v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Smith v. FarleyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- Fillmore v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.