In re Bickmore Shoe Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the Bickmore Shoe Company, bankrupt. On application by bankrupt for refund of unexpended part of composition fund, and by the J. D. Murphy Shoe Company for allowance of claim.
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, District Judge.
On a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, adjudication was made July 3, 1918. August 23, 1918, the bankrupt petitioned for a meeting of creditors to consider a composition of “40 per cent, in cash in full settlement of all unsecured claims.” The composition having been accepted by the requisite majority, on September 21, 1918, the composition was confirmed, and the distribution of the consideration ordered. The order directed payment according to the terms of the composition to claims “which have been filed and allowed” and also to those “which hereafter are filed and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wilmot v. MudgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- In re LaneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
- In re PeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
- In re FrenchDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re CookDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1924
- Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. Brightwood Bronze Foundry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
- In re L. Wenar Millinery Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1923
- Mueller v. Elba Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Mueller v. Elba Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.