Legal Opinion · Dissent
Mueller v. Elba Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 1942No. S. F. 16772Published
1DissentTraynor, J.
— I dissent.
The opinion of the District Court of Appeal in this case by Presiding Justice Peters, modified in part, sets forth the reasons that lead me to conclude that the judgment should be reversed:
“Where a partnership has been adjudicated a bankrupt the individual assets of the general partners may be drawn into the administration of the bankrupt estate, and any surplus remaining after paying individual creditors is applicable to the partnership debts. (Section 5g of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A., § 23g; Francis v. McNeal, 228 U.S. 695 [33 S.Ct. 701, 57 L.Ed. 1029, L.R.A. 1915E, 706] ;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. Brightwood Bronze Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In Re Everick Art CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- In Re Clarence A. Nachman Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.