Legal Opinion

Gravely Motor Plow & Cultivator Co. v. H. v. Carter Co., Inc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1951No. 12844PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages to appellee, hereafter called Carter Co., a California corporation, on a finding that the appellant, hereafter called Gravely Co., a West Virginia corporation, had broken its contract to deliver certain tractors to Carter Co.

Gravely Co. contends that no contract was entered into with Carter Co. for delivery to it of the tractors. Underlying this contention, Gravely claims that the district court lacked jurisdiction in personam over it because a service of summons on one John W. Heinen, general manager of Gravely Pacific,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Conley v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Doris Berkman v. Ann Lewis Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Lurie Company v. Loew's San Francisco Hotel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
  5. Matter of the United Corporation. Joseph B. Hyman, in No. 12151, Randolph Phillips, in Nos. 12157, 12158Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API