Legal Opinion

Uram v. Abex Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1990No. A042379PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.—

Joseph Uram and his wife Virginia Uram claim, respectively, personal injuries and loss of consortium arising from Joseph’s asbestos exposure. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment 1 on the ground that the action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations, which the court determined was Code of Civil Procedure section 340.2. 2 We affirm the judgment.

Facts

Joseph Uram worked as a machinist at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard in Vallejo, California, from 1940 to 1959. For the last four years of his employment he suffered from shortness of breath…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. ELSENBERG v. Alameda Newspapers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Foxborough v. Van AttaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. City of San Diego v. United States Gypsum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API