Legal Opinion
Gilreath v. Beach
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 9, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 2370PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINMAN, Chief Judge.
This action was commenced by plaintiffs Bruce Gilreath and C. J. Ver Halen by a complaint filed June 29,1959 against Theodore L. Beach, d. b. a. Beach Manufacturing Co. Subsequent to the filing of the complaint, the following were added as parties plaintiff: Ted Prutsman Manufacturing Company, Inc., Ted Prutsman Defrosto Mirrors, Inc. and Lansing Company. After a series of assignments, Lansing Company became the owner of the entire legal and equitable title of the patents in suit, having the right to sue for past infringement and any unfair competition.1
The complaint…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- West Point Manufacturing Company v. Detroit Stamping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Allied Wheel Products, Inc. v. RudeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- General Motors Corp. v. Estate Stove Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cavallo v. Utica-Watertown Health Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Davis Harvester Co. v. Long Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
- Bruce Gilreath v. Theodore L. Beach D/B/A Beach Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965