Sicilia v. Tassell
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
With considerable reluctance, I deny the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdictional amount. It is within the range of possibility that a jury would believe the plaintiff’s account of the amount of pain and suffering occasioned by this apparently trivial injury, in spite of the facts that she lost no time from her work and that her medical expenses consisted of a total of $4 for one visit to a physician. In the case cited by the defendant, Bell v. Mykytiuk, D.C., 135 F.Supp. 167 (decided by Judge Kraft), the deposition showed that the injury,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bell v. MykytiukDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raya Rodriguez v. Sears, RoebuckDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
- Rubel v. GrossmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Hinchliffe v. CarrDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Salkoff v. DissikDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Smith v. U. S. Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972