Legal Opinion

Hinchliffe v. Carr

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 23064PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EGAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, suing in their capacity as guardians as well as in their own right, have initiated the instant suit to recover damages as a result of an automobile collision in which the minor plaintiff was injured. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. Rule 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A., for want of the jurisdictional amount.

The defendant has admitted, for the purposes of this motion, that the minor plaintiff has sustained medical expenses in the amount' of $78 and that the property damage to the adult plaintiffs’ automobile amounts to $1,300, or a total…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell v. MykytiukDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Sicilia v. TassellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Salkoff v. DissikDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API