Salkoff v. Dissik
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
EGAN, District Judge.
Defendants (husband and wife) move to dismiss plaintiffs’ (husband and wife) diversity tort action for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that there is no possibility that a verdict in excess of $10,000 could be sustained. Defendants aver that plaintiffs’ injuries were minimal and that their medical expenses totaled $37.
On the other hand, plaintiffs allege-that an orthopedic surgeon diagnosed the-wife plaintiff’s injuries as acute lumbo-sacral strain, sciatic syndrome and a possible protruded disc syndrome which may require surgery and a long hospital stay.
We believe it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Norwood Lumber Corporation v. McKeanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Sicilia v. TassellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Hinchliffe v. CarrDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. U. S. Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972