Bell v. Mykytiuk
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KRAFT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, claim damages arising from a motor vehicle collision. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the action of the wife plaintiff and to dismiss the claim of the husband plaintiff for consequential damages resulting from his wife’s injuries. The latter request is abandoned in defendant’s brief.
The motion to dismiss the wife’s action is based on the contention that her claim is not within the jurisdictional amount.
Resistance to the motion is upon the contention that, under the substantive law of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Nunamaker v. New Alexandria Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Weinberger v. Toms River Express, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by10 opinions
- Del Sesto v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1962
- Lynn v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Sobel v. National Fruit Product Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- McCormick v. LabelleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1960
- Sicilia v. TassellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.