Legal Opinion

Politte v. Idaho Department of Transportation

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1994No. 20617PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a workers’ compensation case. We conclude that the employer did not present substantial evidence contrary to the presumption contained in I.C. § 72-228 that the employee’s injury arose out of his employment.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

Thomas C. Politte (the employee) was employed by the Idaho department of transportation (the department) as a highway maintenance worker. On October 11, 1988, the employee worked his regular shift from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m., tending to routine maintenance chores at a highway rest area. When the employee arrived home from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kinney v. Tupperware Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Evans v. Hara's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Larson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Nelson v. David L. Hill LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hadden v. A & P Tea Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Emmett ManorIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fowble v. Snoline Express, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jordan v. Walmart Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Nelson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Idaho Industrial Special Indemnity Fund v. Perry Joe FowbleIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API