Politte v. Idaho Department of Transportation
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a workers’ compensation case. We conclude that the employer did not present substantial evidence contrary to the presumption contained in I.C. § 72-228 that the employee’s injury arose out of his employment.
I
THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.
Thomas C. Politte (the employee) was employed by the Idaho department of transportation (the department) as a highway maintenance worker. On October 11, 1988, the employee worked his regular shift from 7:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m., tending to routine maintenance chores at a highway rest area. When the employee arrived home from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kinney v. Tupperware Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Evans v. Hara's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Larson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
- Nelson v. David L. Hill LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Hadden v. A & P Tea Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. Emmett ManorIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Fowble v. Snoline Express, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Jordan v. Walmart Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Nelson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Idaho Industrial Special Indemnity Fund v. Perry Joe FowbleIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.