Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sykes v. C. P. Clare & Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1980No. 12610Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

It is undisputed, as noted by the majority, that generally the claimant has the burden of showing “the extent and duration of the disability in order to recover.” This rule is not an absolute, however. It has been held, for instance, that once the parties enter a compensation agreement paying claimant for total disability, that total disability “is presumed to continue unless and until competent examination and testimony discloses otherwise. The burden of proving that claimant’s disability had ceased altogether or had become partial was upon the employer.” Fox v. American News Co., 190…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Paulson v. Idaho Forest Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Fackenthall v. Eggers Pole & Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Boshers v. PayneIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Channing v. PaytonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API