Legal Opinion

Campshure v. Standard Manufacturing Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1908PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Oconto •county: S. D. Hastings, Circuit Judge. Action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtTimliN, J.

There was a special verdict by which the jury found the negligence of the defendant in permitting a saw to be used in its shop and factory without a guard or *157bood over it. This negligence caused the injury. It was then found that the plaintiff did not know, at the time of his injury, that there was danger of ..serious injury resulting to him from the use of the saw without a cover over it; but by the seventh question that the plaiptiff ought, in the exercise of ordinary care, to have reasonably anticipated that there was danger of serious injury resulting to him from the use of the saw…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Powell v. Ashland Iron & Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Nadau v. White River Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Deisenrieter v. Kraus-Merkel Malting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Howard v. Beldenville Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hennesey v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Colson v. RuleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Knauer v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Fandek v. Barnett & Record Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API