Legal Opinion

Colson v. Rule

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1962PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCuRRiE, J.

While the verdict contained a question which inquired as to plaintiff Colson’s contributory negligence, together with an accompanying question on causation, it contained no question on assumption of risk by Colson. The learned trial court had denied a timely request by defendant’s counsel that the verdict contain a question on assumption of risk. One of the reasons advanced for refusing to submit such a question was that the concurring opinions in Baird v. Cornelius (1961), 12 Wis. (2d) 284, 107 N. W. (2d) 278, had sounded a warning that assumption of risk in cases of this kind was about to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Powell v. Ashland Iron & Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Baird v. CorneliusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hennesey v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Anderson v. CeccardiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. State v. EsserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Fitzgerald v. Meissner & Hicks, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API