Feagin v. Fife
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Creek county, denying a motion for an order nunc pro tunc. The sole question presented is whether the trial court erred in holding the evidence insufficient to justify the making of the requested order.
The facts are undisputed. The action was filed on September 1, 1915, by Lena Nelson, a minor, by Ed Hart, her guardian, and Rhoda Fife, nee Nelson, against John T. Milliken and numerous other defendants. It involved the title to the Lete Kolvin allotment in the Cushing oil field. Plaintiffs claimed to be the sole heirs of Lete Kolvin, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hirsh v. TwyfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Courtney v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Clark v. Bank of HennesseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Co-Wok-Ochee v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Woodmansee v. WoodmanseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Parks v. BriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Tate v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Brady ex rel. Brady v. BradyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014