Legal Opinion

Co-Wok-Ochee v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1919No. 6055PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from District Court, Seminole County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action between Co-wok-ochee and James A. Chapman and others. From judgment of district court reversing order of county court overruling motion to amend judgment, movant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an appeal from the action of the district court of Seminole county in reversing an order of the county court of said county overruling a motion, filed after the term, to correct the entry of a judgment, formerly entered in the latter court, by a nunc pro tunc order.

It seems that on the 7th day of October, 1912, the clerk of the county court entered a formal judgment in the matter of the estate of Albert Wildcat, deceased, whereby it was adjudged that said decedent left surviving him the following heirs at law and no others, to wit: “Co-wok-ochee, father, John Wildcat, brother,” and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. GallagherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Clark v. Bank of HennesseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Bank of Kingfisher v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  4. Hill v. HooverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of FlowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Ferguson v. Ferguson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Stork v. StorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Abernathy v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API