Legal Opinion

City of Ortonville v. Geer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1904No. Nos. 14,033—(90)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant Charles Betcher Lumber Company from a judgment of the district court for Big Stone county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Flaherty, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

This action was brought by the city of Ortonville to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon a hotel building and lots in that city. Other lien claimants were made parties defendant, and the Charles Betcher Lumber Company, owners of real estate mortgages thereon, were also made defendants. The action was tried to the court, and, upon findings of fact, judgment was ordered subordinating the liens of the mortgages to those of the lien claimants, which was duly entered. The mortgagee appeals.

It appears from the findings of the court that one Geer became the owner of several lots in the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wentworth v. TubbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Gardner v. LeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Glass v. FreeburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Miller v. StoddardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Olsen v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Erickson v. IrelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Van Eepoel Real Estate Co. v. Sarasota Milk Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Brettschneider v. WellmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. Phenix Biocomposites, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Rudd Lumber Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API