Legal Opinion

Rudd Lumber Co. v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 1925No. 24,252PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Plaintiff filed a claim for a mechanic’s lien for $2,571.05 on property. owned by the defendant Martin Anderson and brought this action to foreclose the lien.

The court found that Anderson owed but $161.88, and that in its lien statement plaintiff had knowingly demanded more than was justly due. Plaintiff has appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

In the summer of 1920, Anderson, who conducted an automobile repair shop in the village of Braham in Isanti county, began the construction of a large garage. He purchased building materials from the plaintiff, who had a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erickson v. IrelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Benton v. Minneapolis Tailoring & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Fort Dearborn National Bank v. SeymourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. City of Ortonville v. GeerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Lyons v. WesterdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New York Casualty Co. v. SazenskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Kasner v. GageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Blumberg v. TaggartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Home Supply Co. Inc. v. OstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Meyers v. Barrett & Zimmerman, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API