Legal Opinion · Dissent

Van Eepoel Real Estate Co. v. Sarasota Milk Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 3, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1DissentEllis, J.

(on rehearing, dissenting) :

The question presented is one of priority of liens. The facts are as follows:

On November 25, 1925, the Tampa Stock Farms Dairy Company, a corporation, owned.„the^west-fifty íeei — ofuLots 2, 4, 6 and.jjLof-Bb^1'"'53 -¡nUie City of Sarasota. The corporation had completed a building on the west fifty feet of Lot 2 and installed machinery for the purpose of operating a “milk plant” on the property. It engaged in the business of pasteurizing, bottling and distributing milk in Sarasota. It was enagaged in the same business in Tampa. In Sarasota the business was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Dyson v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  2. Peoples Bank v. ArbuckleSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. Feinberg v. StearnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Thielman v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. RoperSupreme Court of Florida · 1914

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bob DeGeorge Associates, Inc. v. Hawthorn BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. City of Palm Bay v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Argent Mortgage Co. v. Wachovia Bank N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. United States v. Morris Wayne Davis, A/K/A "Red" Davis, A/K/A Wayne L. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Freligh v. MaurerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API