Legal Opinion

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. Lohges

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1893No. 687PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Erom the Warrick Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

This is an action by the mother to recover damages for the death of her child, who was run over by appellant’s train of cars.

The complaint was in five paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer for want of sufficient facts was filed and overruled. This action of the court is assigned for error.

The appellant questions each paragraph upon the ground

First. That no negligence is shown upon the part of appellant.

Second. That no freedom from contributory negligence is shown upon the part of the mother and child.

Third., That no right of action whatever is shown in the mother, the appellee.

Counsel for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Isabel v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Frankel v. GarrardIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CronbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Citizens' Street Railroad v. WilloebyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Halstead v. CoenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API