Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Adair
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J. —
The appellee alleges, in his amended complaint, that the appellant “is and was, on the 11th day of January, 1892,- a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, and that on said day defendant owned and was operating and controlling a railway in and through the city of Indianapolis; that *570said railway extended in a northeasterly direction from Massachusetts avenue depot, in said city, to the town of Brightwood, in said county and State; that said defendant had and maintained, on said date, tracks between aforesaid points and that said tracks were used by foot…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Pawling and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CronbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Indiana Pipe Line & Refining Co. v. NeusbaumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.