Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Adair

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1895No. 1,391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J. —

The appellee alleges, in his amended complaint, that the appellant “is and was, on the 11th day of January, 1892,- a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, and that on said day defendant owned and was operating and controlling a railway in and through the city of Indianapolis; that *570said railway extended in a northeasterly direction from Massachusetts avenue depot, in said city, to the town of Brightwood, in said county and State; that said defendant had and maintained, on said date, tracks between aforesaid points and that said tracks were used by foot…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Pawling and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
  4. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CronbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Indiana Pipe Line & Refining Co. v. NeusbaumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API