Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Corwin v. Markley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

Immediately after the passage of the resolution of March 22d, 1892, considered in Markley v: The Borough-of Cape May Point, the council of the borough appointed the-relator to fill the alleged vacancy in the office of borough collector, and he now asks for a mandamus- directing the respondent to deliver to him the official money and property.

*108As we have adjudged the resolution to be illegal, it follows that the respondent was still lawfully entitled to the office, =and the appointment of the relator was invalid. Of course, •therefore, the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. Walter v. WalterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Summerville v. SummervilleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. McArthur v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API