Legal Opinion

Summerville v. Summerville

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1903No. 4300PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hoe. Arthur E. Grieeie, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*412The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Hadley, J.

— Respondent brought this action against appellant for divorce and alimony. The complaint al-. leges that the two were, married at Lake Linderman, in British Columbia, on June 18, 1898; that .a child, two years of age at the time the complaint was drawn, was born as the issue of the marriage; that on or about August, 1899, appellant sent respondent out from Dawson City, where they were then residing, together with the child, then three ■ months old, and stated to respondent that he would send her money, and that he would also come out later…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Arthur v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  3. State v. HodgskinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841
  4. State ex rel. Corwin v. MarkleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  5. Murray v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State Ex Rel. Bentley v. FrengerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. WakefieldOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Shank v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Weatherall v. WeatherallWashington Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API