Stott v. Cervantes
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtRoe, J.
Plaintiffs Stott contracted to purchase certain real property from defendants Cervantes. Paragraph 18 of the contract provided:
Attorney's Fees and Venue — In the event of any lawsuit between the parties to this contract to settle issues arising hereunder, the prevailing party shall recover judgment against the other party for a reasonable attorney's fee.
(Italics ours.) Believing there had been misrepresentations as to the condition of the real estate, plaintiffs sued defendants for either rescission or $10,000 damages. At trial the prayer for rescission was abandoned, but the court awarded…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Aquarian Foundation v. KTVW, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Artz v. O'BANNONCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Snider v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by18 opinions
- Marassi v. LauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Silverdale Hotel Associates v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Agnew v. Lacey Co-PlyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Western Stud Welding, Inc. v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Sardam v. MorfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.