Wright v. Ward
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought for an accounting to ascertain the interest which the defendant had acquired by his purchase at an execution sale of the interest of the plaintiff’s copartner. The remaining facts are stated in the opinion of the court. _
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The complaint charges, and the court below, from evidence sufficient to sustain the finding, found the fact to be, that the subject of this action—a certain lot of cattle—was in the year 1876 a part of the property of a copartnership consisting of the plaintiff Wright and one Wellington. It is further alleged and found to be true that on the 27th of June, 1876, and during the existence of that copartnership, the defendant Ward commenced an action in the late District Court of Shasta County against Wellington, to recover judgment upon a money demand, in which action a writ of attachment was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jones v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Robinson v. TevisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Young v. HoglanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Thomas v. GlendinningUtah Supreme Court · 1896
- Rudnick v. DelfinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- First National Bank v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.