Legal Opinion
Chin v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 11, 1998No. Civ.A. No. 95-5569 JCLPublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 23. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ have failed to meet the prerequisites for class certification under Fed. R.Civ.P. 23 and therefore the motion will be denied without prejudice.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs’ cause of action stems from an alleged defect in the anti-lock braking system (“ABS”) in certain vehicles that were manufactured and distributed by Defendant Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler”) between the model years 1989 and 1993. Plaintiffs’ *451Third Amended…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Julie Olden, Richard Hunter, Wilbur Bleau, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lafarge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Beverly Cole Anita S. Perkins Jewell P. Lowe v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.