Legal Opinion

Allen v. . Yarborough

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Before a verdict is complete it must be accepted by tbe court for record. S. v. Godwin, 138 N. C., 582; S. v. Bagley, 158 N. C., 608; S. v. Snipes, 185 N. C., 743. Tbis does not imply, however, that in accepting or rejecting a verdict tbe presiding judge may exercise unrestrained discretion. It is bis duty to scrutinize a verdict with respect to its form and substance and to prevent a doubtful or insufficient finding from becoming a record of tbe court. S. v. Bazemore, 193 N. C., 336. But bis power to accept or reject tbe jury’s finding is restricted to tbe exercise of a limited legal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. . WhitsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. State v. Godwin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Baker v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. State v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1819
  5. State v. . BazemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Selph v. SelphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Bass v. DehnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. State v. GatlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Southeastern Fire Insurance Company v. WaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API