State v. . Perry
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
Was it the duty of the court below to accept and record the verdict first tendered by the jury? We are constrained to answer in the affirmative.
While a verdict is a substantial right, Bundy v. Sutton, 207 N. C., 422, 177 S. E., 420, it is not complete until it is accepted by the court for record. S. v. Godwin, 138 N. C., 582; S. v. Bagley, 158 N. C., 608, 73 S. E., 995; S. v. Snipes, 185 N. C., 743, 117 S. E., 500; Allen v. Yarborough, 201 N. C., 568, 160 S. E., 833.
This does not imply, however, that in accepting or rejecting a verdict the presiding judge may exercise unrestrained discretion.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. . McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- State v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- State v. . LitteralSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. LitteralSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.