Legal Opinion

Ellen Armstrong and David, J. Armstrong v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1964No. 18736PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge:

Following trial to a jury, the appellants Ellen Armstrong and David J. Armstrong, husband and wife, were convicted on each count of a four count indictment. The indictment charged that appellants did willfully and knowingly attempt to evade and defeat a large part of the income tax due and owing by them to the United States of America for the calendar' years 1956 through 1959, respectively, in violation of Title 26 U.S.C. § 7201, which in pertinent part provides:

“Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Commissioner v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Rutkin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Charles Edward Matthews, Ezekiel Brown and Raymond Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API