Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1976No. Nos. 75-1731, 75-1736 and 75-1737PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Boyd Gray (a/k/a Punkin), Isreal Wilson (a/k/a Big Man), and Brenda Brown appeal from their convictions for conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The singular and difficult issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in admitting two notebooks and their contents which a government witness read to the jury. We find no error and affirm the convictions.

The sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conspiracy conviction of each defendant is not challenged. However, a review of the facts is essential to the ruling on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TolisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Winston M. Reynolds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. United States v. Andrew Pasha, Peter Grafner, and Arthur MonacoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. Lee Vernon SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. Ellen Armstrong and David, J. Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. DrougasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Gilberto Martinez (03-3833), Jerel Henderson (03-3835), Kevin S. Harris (03-3879), Brian Garrett (03-3917)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API