Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1939No. 30656PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsen, J.

This is a proceeding to recover additional compensation under the workmen’s compensation law, on the ground of increased disability. The workmen’s compensation court held that, since the increase in disability was known to plaintiff more than a year before the filing of her petition, the claim was barred under section 48-138, Comp. St. 1929. On appeal to the district court, the proceeding was similarly dismissed. Plaintiff, who was 73 years old, had died in the meantime, and revivor was had in the name of the special administrator of her estate, who has appealed to this court.

Plaintiff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Johnson v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Kurtz v. Sunderland Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Dunlap v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peek v. Ayers Auto SupplyNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Schmidt v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Bame v. Lipsett, IncorporatedNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Plambeck v. NATKIN & COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API