Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1940No. 30652PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsen, J.

This is a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation law, which was dismissed by the district court and is here on an appeal by plaintiff.

Plaintiff claims to have been injured on August 29, 1936, while employed by defendant as a city fireman. He says *547that he fell on his right hip and buttock, while carrying a hose line into the basement at a fire. No one saw the accident, and the record seems to imply a doubt in the minds of some of the other firemen'whether it ever occurred. He was on a twenty-four hour shift at the time and remained on duty all day and night following, apparently without…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Baade v. Omaha Flour Mills Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Park v. School District No. 27Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. New Staunton Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Aiello v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Solheim v. Hastings Housing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Haler v. Gering Bean CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Peek v. Ayres Auto SupplyNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Chadd v. Western Casualty & Surety CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Bronson v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API