Legal Opinion

Davis v. WOOD ET UX.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment and for additional affirmative relief. The plaintiff who purchased personal property under a conditional sales contract contends that the seller-defendants wrongfully declared a forfeiture and converted the property to their own use. The plaintiff seeks a decree determining the amount, if any, which is due to the defendants on the purchase price and declaring that the plaintiff, upon paying such amount, if any, shall be the owner of the property. He seeks restitution of the property or its value, and damages for the withholding thereof. From a decree…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Epplett v. Empire Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Johnson v. FeskensOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Zumstein v. STOCKTON ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Anderson v. HurlbertOregon Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ken Leahy Construction, Inc. v. Cascade General, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. County of Lincoln v. FISCHEROregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Brown v. Music IncorporatedAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Neuschafer v. McHaleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Osberg Construction Co. v. City of the DallesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API