Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Snider

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1888No. 13,381PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

McKinney commenced a proceeding supplemental to execution by filing a verified complaint in which he alleged that he had recovered judgment for $254.20 against James B. Snider, in the Clinton Circuit Court, on the 4th day of September, 1879, which judgment remained wholly unpaid. It was averred that an execution had been duly issued, and that the defendant, the Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Company, was indebted to Snider in the sum of $500, “ which together with property which said Snider might lawfully claim as exempt from execution exceeds the amount of his said exemption.” It…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abell v. RiddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Fowler v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Pouder v. TateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Mitchell v. BrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelley v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Harper v. BehaggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Balz v. BenninghofIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API