Legal Opinion

Abell v. Riddle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7668PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Crawford Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

Proceedings supplementary to execution. The appellee instituted the proceedings by filing two affidavits, to which the defendant Abell, who alone appeals, filed a general demurrer, and to each of the affidavits a separate demurrer, for want of facts, and, having saved exceptions to the overruling thereof, has made the proper assignment of error. The appellee claims that the two affidavits are to be treated as constituting, together, one application, but the appellant insists that the sufficiency of each must be determined by itself.

The effort of the appellee was to subject a particular claim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. DameIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. McMahan v. WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. HowesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Johnson v. BreedloveIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Graham v. CrockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Wilson v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Friedersdorf v. LacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kelley v. McFaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API