Legal Opinion

Balz v. Benninghof

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1892No. 635PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, C. J.

Appellees commenced a proceeding supplemental to execution against appellants, alleging in their affidavit that they held a judgment against the appellant Peter Balz for $522.20, which was wholly unpaid; that they caused an execution to be issued upon said judgment to the sheriff of Vanderburgh county, which was then in the hands of such sheriff, in full force and wholly unsatisfied ; that said Peter Balz was, at the time of the issuing of said execution and at the time of the commencement of said proceeding, the owner of a large sum of money, to wit, $3,000, which he had, with intent to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. TrauermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Taylor v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cushman v. GephartIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Dillman v. DillmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Fowler v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Bank of Whiting v. Samocki Bros. Trucking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Beckman Supply Co. v. NewellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Harper v. BehaggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Vordermark v. WilkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Reuter v. MonroeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API