Legal Opinion
Korman v. Nobile
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 21, 1960No. Civ. A. 3822PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STARR, Chief Judge.
It appears that on February 9, 1960, in pursuance of 35 U.S.C.A. § 24, Arthur Nobile and his assignee, Schering Corporation, caused subpoenas to be issued by the clerk of this court, commanding John A. Hogg and Jerome Korman of The Upjohn Company, and H. B. Allen secre tary of The Upjohn Company, to appear at Parlor A, Hotel Harris, Kalamazoo, Michigan, on February 15, 1960, to testify in behalf of said Arthur Nobile and Schering Corporation, assignee, and to bring with them certain books, papers, and documents listed and enumerated in the subpoenas.
It appears that on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less, Containing "Figlia Mia Brand", Etc. (5 Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Martin v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Cleary Brothers v. Christie Scow CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- In Re Natta, Movant in the United States Patent Office Before the Examiner of Interferences, Interference No. 89634. Hogan v. Zletz v. Baxter v. Natta E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Gladrow v. WeiszCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Sommerfield v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.