Legal Opinion
Radio Corporation of America v. Philco Corporation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 11, 1967No. Civ. 265-64PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANE, District Judge:
This is an action under 35 U.S.C. § 146 to review the decision of the United States Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences in an interference proceeding between Harold B. Law and John W. Tiley, and their respective assignees, Radio Corporation of America [hereinafter “RCA”] and Philco Corporation [hereinafter “Philco”].
Plaintiff, RCA, is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is licensed to do business in the State of New Jersey. Defendant, Philco, is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Herbert J. Roberts v. Norman M. Ross, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Mergenthaler v. ScudderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
- Application of Maximilian Paul SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
- Nicholas L. Etten and Chamberlain Corporation v. Lovell Manufacturing Company and Walter L. Kauffman, 2dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- In the Matter of Las Colinas, Inc., and Eastern Shore Development Corporation, Debtors, Appeal of Vigdor SchreibmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Johnson & Johnson v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.