Mahaney v. Mahaney
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentChambers, J.
(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent. I sympathize with my colleagues’ desire to keep the Mahaney children with their paternal grandmother who has nurtured and protected them and provided them with a stable environment since 1993. It is, however, incumbent on this Court to enforce the laws of the United States. While the majority would apply the Washington standard of best interests of the children and would transfer the case to juvenile court, I would remand to superior court with an order for a new trial for the court to apply the standards of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA),…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State Ex Rel Juvenile Department v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- I.P. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.