State Ex Rel Juvenile Department v. Tucker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The state brought this action to terminate mother’s parental rights. The father is unknown. The court determined that the child is an “Indian child,” according to the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 USC § 1901 et seq (ICWA), and that, therefore, the termination proceedings are governed by the ICWA, as well as by ORS 419.523, 419.525 and 419.527. Mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights, contending that the ICWA was not complied with in several respects. The child cross-appeals, arguing that it was error to apply the ICWA, because she is not an Indian child. We affirm.
On March…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Application of AngusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by35 opinions
- L.G. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- People in Interest of JJSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Mahaney v. MahaneyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Matter of NLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- In re the Welfare of L.N.B.-L.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.