Legal Opinion

National Bank of North America v. Associates of Obstetrics & Female Surgery, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 26, 1976No. 75-1106PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner is a national banking association with its principal place of business in New York. It has no offices or agents in Utah and does not regularly conduct business in that State. The respondent Associates of Obstetrics brought a breach-of-contract action against the petitioner in a Utah state court, seeking damages on the ground that the petitioner had induced the respondent to lend a large sum of money to a Utah corporation on the representation that the loan would be protected and that the petitioner had defaulted on this agreement. The petitioner moved to dismiss the complaint…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Michigan National Bank v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Associates of Obstetrics & Female Surgery, Inc. v. Apollo Productions, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Leavitt v. Jane L.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. BougasSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Attorney General v. INDUS. NATIONAL BANK OF RIMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. West v. City National Bank of BirminghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API