Legal Opinion

In re Jonathan P.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 11, 1990No. 8221PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The respondent father1 is appealing the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to three minor children rendered after petitions were brought by the department of children and youth services (DCYS) pursuant to General Statutes § 17-43a. He claims that the trial court improperly proceeded and heard testimony before he arrived in court. We agree and remand for further proceedings.

The following facts are uncontested and are relevant to the disposition of this appeal. The petitions submitted by DCYS allege abandonment, absence of parent-child relationships, and failure to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. In Re Juvenile AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Hurtado v. HurtadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re Alexander V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. In re Hector L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. In re Mark C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. In re David L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API