Legal Opinion

CITY AND CTY. OF HONOLULU v. Toyama

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1979No. 6363PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court, granting summary judgment for summary possession to plaintiff-appellee City and County of Honolulu (hereinafter appellee) against defendant-tenant-appellants Kamakichi Toyama, dba K. T. Poolroom, Fusako Chinen, dba New Kukui Cafe, Bacilio Balalong, Margaret Balalong, Hilario Gungab, Magdalena Gungab, Victorino Nabora, Marina Nabora, Rufino Ramos, Sotera Ramos, Mariano Tarampi, Rita Tarampi, Arnold Ramos, Luis Mendoza, Ricarte Vidad, and Estanislao Balais (hereinafter appellants).

In the court below appellee brought an action for summary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ApaoHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pickering v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Richards v. MidkiffHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Gealon v. KealaHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hunt Ex Rel. Hunt v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ai v. Frank Huff Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bidar v. Amfac, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Methven-Abreu v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API