Legal Opinion

Grossman v. City of Cleveland Heights

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1997No. 71411PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rocco, Judge.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s entry affirming the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Cleveland Heights. Appellant brought his appeal in the court below pursuant to R.C. Chapter 2506. However, appellant argued, both in the court below and before this court, that the ordinance at issue is unconstitutional on its face.

Appellant failed to argue that the administrative decision was not supported by a preponderance of the reliable, probative and substantial evidence as is required when bringing an R.C. Chapter 2506 appeal. Alternatively, appellant failed to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Jones v. Village of Chagrin FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. LaVon Moore v. Hiram Twp., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. City of Cleveland v. PosnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Smith v. Richfield Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Roy v. Cleveland Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Dawson v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API