Legal Opinion

State v. Glowacki

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 2001No. C8-99-1507PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

Respondent William Glowacki was charged with assault, disorderly conduct, and domestic assault for allegedly attacking a woman in his home. At trial Glo-wacki asserted that he was acting in self-defense and requested that the district court instruct the jury on self-defense. The court, relying on a Minnesota Court of Appeals case that had been reversed, included a duty to retreat instruction along with a self-defense instruction. Glowacki was found guilty on all charges. The court of appeals reversed the jury’s guilty verdicts on assault and domestic assault,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. . TomlinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. State v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. State v. HennumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. CrowsbreastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. BairdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. O'MEARA v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. State v. PenkatySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API