Legal Opinion
Clear Channel Outdoor Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 2003No. 02-56947PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge.
The City of Los Angeles, its Department of Building and Safety, and the Chief of *812the Department’s Code Enforcement Bureau appeal the district court’s order granting the motion of Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., Viacom Outdoor, Inc., and National Advertising Company for a preliminary injunction enjoining the City from implementing ordinances that provide for the inspection of off-site billboards and the assessment of a fee to cover the cost of that inspection. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and this Court has jurisdiction under 28…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sports Form, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. United Press International, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Sammartano v. First Judicial District Court, in and for the County of Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Monica Navarro Pimentel v Susan DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Freecycle Network, Inc. v. OeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Raich v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.