Legal Opinion
Monica Navarro Pimentel v Susan Dreyfus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 29, 2012No. 11-35237PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Plaintiff Monica Navarro Pimentel (“Pimentel”) represents a class of legal immigrants in the state of Washington adversely affected by its recent termination of a state-funded food assistance program for legal immigrants, which exclusively benefited Washington resident aliens who became ineligible for federal food stamps following the enactment of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. 1 Pimentel contends that the state, by eliminating food assistance to class members while continuing to administer federal food assistance to U.S. citizens and…
3Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by150 opinions
- Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Pacific Radiation Oncology v. the Queen's Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. Vidangel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Reyes v. BonnarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.