Legal Opinion

State v. Scheidemann

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the crime of illegal possession of narcotics.

The sole assignment of error is the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence (marijuana) seized under a warrant which defendant contends was not supported by an adequate affidavit. The affidavit read as follows :

“STATE OF OREGON )) ss.

County of Lane )

“AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT
“I, Guy D. Mattoon, having been duly sworn on oath hereby depose and say as follows:
“That I am a member of the Eugene, Oregon, Police Department and that in connection with my duties as a Detective Sergeant with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. State v. KittredgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. KoppenhaferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API